Compensation And Rewards In The Digital Age: The Development Of Performance Systems, Bonuses, And A Flexible Approach To Employee Rewards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59971/meta-journal.v3i4.427Keywords:
Compensation, Performance, Digital Age, Rewards, Employee RewardsAbstract
Purpose − In the rapidly evolving digital era, the paradigm of employee compensation and rewards is undergoing a fundamental transformation. The concept of Digital Compensation and Rewards has emerged as a response to these changes, emphasizing the development of adaptive performance systems, innovative bonus strategies, and flexible reward mechanisms. Overall, this paradigm introduces modern approaches to human resource management. As digitalization advances, compensation and reward systems are also undergoing significant changes, with the use of technology enabling the more efficient implementation of performance-based systems. Findings − The literature review indicates that technology has a significant positive impact on the employee recruitment process. Additionally, the implementation of digital compensation and rewards plays a crucial role in enhancing employee performance. Design/Methodology/Approach − By utilizing data-driven performance assessments through digital platforms, companies can collect and analyze employee performance data in greater detail. This enables more objective and accurate evaluations, while also creating opportunities to provide appropriate recognition for individual contributions. Practical Implications − These include improving recruitment processes through digital technology and social media, adapting compensation systems to incorporate digital performance bonuses and application-based incentives, providing flexibility in rewards tailored to individual preferences, leveraging data analytics to accurately measure employee performance, and developing HR competencies in integrating digital technology into human resource management. By addressing these implications, organizations can strengthen their HR strategies to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the digital era, ultimately supporting organizational growth and success. Originality/Value − This study offers an innovative perspective on how organizations can leverage digital technology and more flexible bonus systems to enhance employee motivation and productivity. With a focus on the digital era, it highlights the importance of adapting to technological changes in human resource management. The key value of this paper lies in providing practical guidance for organizations aiming to optimize employee performance and reward systems in an increasingly dynamic digital environment.
Downloads
References
Aguinis, H. (2021). Performance management (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago Business Press.
Ali, M., Lei, S., & Wei, X. Y. (2020). The mediating role of employee engagement in the relationship between organizational justice and employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(6), 1059–1076. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2019-0405
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2021). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice (15th ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Baptista, J., Stein, M. K., Klein, S., Watson-Manheim, M. B., & Lee, J. (2020). Digital work and organizational transformation: Emergent digital/human work configurations in modern organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(4), 1121–1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2020.1831777
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London: SAGE Publications.
Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427
Christy, N. A., et al. (2020). Digital reward systems and employee motivation: A study in modern organizations. Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3), 145–156.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Dahlstrom, T. R., Walker, D. D., & Dziuban, C. D. (2022). Digital engagement and reward systems in modern workplaces. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-07-2021-0085
DeNisi, A., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000085
Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2015). Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review, 25(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.09.010
Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., et al. (2016). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(6), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2015-0040
Kossek, E. E., & Lee, M. D. (2017). Implementing a reduced-workload arrangement to retain high talent. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.03.001
Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., & Dysvik, A. (2020). Individual variable pay for performance, incentive effects, and employee motivation. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12264
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2020). Compensation (13th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., et al. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Potale, B. R., & Uhing, Y. (2015). The effect of compensation and work stress on employee performance. EMBA Journal, 3(2), 63–74.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2021). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
Suparyadi. (2014). Human resource management: Creating competency-based competitive advantages. Yogyakarta: No.
Suwati, Y. (2013). The effect of compensation and work motivation on employee performance. Journal of Management Science, 1(1), 41–55.
Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Wati, L. N., Adisaputro, G., & Meliala, A. (2019). The effect of the compensation system on employee performance. Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 45–53.
