A Critical Theory Perspective On Employer Branding Dilemmas in Traditional Companies Attracting Gen Z Talent in the Gig Economy

Authors

  • Agung Widhi Kurniawan Study Program Management, Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59971/meta-journal.v2i3.322

Keywords:

Employer Branding, Generation Z, Gig Economy, Critical Theory, Talent Acquisition

Abstract

The gig economy has disrupted traditional employment models, creating significant challenges for conventional companies in attracting Generation Z (Gen Z) talent. This study examines employer branding dilemmas through a Critical Theory lens, exploring power dynamics, structural inequalities, and ideological conflicts between traditional corporate structures and Gen Z's work preferences. Using qualitative data from Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with HR professionals and Gen Z freelancers, the research reveals a fundamental mismatch between traditional employer value propositions (job stability, hierarchical growth) and Gen Z's expectations of flexibility, purpose-driven work, and digital-first engagement. Findings highlight systemic contradictions in corporate attempts to reconcile rigid structures with gig economy appeal. The study recommends rethinking employer branding narratives to align with Gen Z's critical perspectives on labor markets, proposing hybrid models that blend security with autonomy. This research contributes to ongoing debates about sustainable talent acquisition in evolving economic landscapes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. R. (2021). The rise of the gig economy: Fact or fiction? Industrial Relations, 60(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12265

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Deloitte. (2023). 2023 Global Gen Z and Millennial Survey. Deloitte Insights.

Fleming, P. (2022). Dark academia: How universities die. Pluto Press.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2021). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (6th ed.). SAGE.

Kuhn, K. M. (2023). The rise of the gig economy and its implications for worker well-being. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 261-285. https://doi.org/[insert DOI if available]

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2022). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

Meister, J., & Willyerd, K. (2021). The 2025 workplace: How innovative companies attract, develop, and keep tomorrow's employees today. Harper Business.

Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2020). Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 124-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219832310

Schwartz, J., Collins, L., Stockton, H., Wagner, D., & Walsh, B. (2021). The future of work: Insights from the front lines of disruption. Deloitte University Press.

Smith, A., & Anderson, J. (2022). The gig economy's generational divide: Why Gen Z chooses flexibility over fidelity. MIT Press.

Spreitzer, G., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2022). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 473-499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090843

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

How to Cite

Kurniawan, A. W. (2025). A Critical Theory Perspective On Employer Branding Dilemmas in Traditional Companies Attracting Gen Z Talent in the Gig Economy. Management, Economics, Trade, and Accounting Journal (META-JOURNAL), 2(3), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.59971/meta-journal.v2i3.322

Issue

Section

Article